This article details the definition of restaking, compares it with existing staking models in traditional finance, provides an analogy with the traditional financial model, and discusses the inherent risks of restaking and how they differ from other staking models. The article is sourced from the author Tarun Chitra and translated at the Restaking Summit in Istanbul on November 13, 2023, by LXDAO, compiled and written by PANews.
Introduction:
Why is A16z heavily invested in EigenLayer? Detailed explanation of the value and economic security of the Ethereum restaking protocol.
Background:
Commentary on whether restaking encrypted products are “triangular debt or mild inflation.”
Table of Contents:
What is Restaking?
Restaking and Traditional Finance?!
What risks does Restaking bring?
Visualizing Restaking risks
How do we mitigate these risks?
This article provides a deep explanation of the definition of restaking by Gauntlet founder Tarun Chitra at the Restaking Summit in Istanbul on November 13, 2023. It explains the inherent risks of restaking and the specific differences in risks between restaking and other staking models in an easy-to-understand manner to help better understand the principles of restaking and the risks involved.
Restaking Definition:
Restaking may seem interesting but confusing at first, mainly due to the unclear source of additional risks. The article attempts to explain these risks and mitigation methods to make risks less intimidating. Various discussions related to restaking in different scenarios were heard today.
Vitalik’s definition of restaking involves the ability for someone to reuse their stake and introduces additional slashing rules, unrelated to network activity but used for security purposes.
By introducing restaking, new networks like MEV auctions and FHE (Fully Homomorphic Encryption) are brought in, adding new slashing elements in fee processing.
The risks involved in restaking include slashing risks, liquidity risks, and centralization risks, and understanding these risks is crucial to effectively manage them.
Restaking and Traditional Finance:
Linking restaking with traditional finance may not sound exciting, but it can provide valuable insights. Restaking applications and AVS (Actively Validated Service) are somewhat similar to verifiable corporate bonds, where new networks seek security in Layer1, akin to companies leveraging another country’s financial system to issue bonds and protect assets.
The concept is likened to borrowing against government bonds in the repo markets, where companies store cash in sovereign bonds and collateralize them for loans when needed.
Restaking Risks:
Within the financial risks associated with restaking, slashing risk is the most severe, followed by liquidity risk and centralization risk. It’s crucial to address these risks effectively to maintain a secure staking environment.
Visualizing Restaking Risks:
Graphs demonstrate the changing value of a position over time with different risks yielding different outcomes, emphasizing the importance of managing these risks effectively with parameters optimization and rebalancing of assets.
Mitigating Risks:
By optimizing parameters and rebalancing assets, investors can potentially enhance the outcomes and manage risks effectively in the restaking process.
Related Reports
DeFi Total Value Locked surpasses $100 billion, highest since May 2022, Ethereum’s “LSD, Restaking” most popular track.
Restaking track heating up! Binance Labs’ He Yi invests again in Renzo Protocol.
Ethereum restaking protocol EigenLayer gaining popularity, unlocking new airdrops and earnings potential.