Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Market Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investment
  • Blockchain
    • Financial Market
    • Bank
    • Wallet
    • Payment
    • DeFi
    • Blockchain Platform
    • Supply Chain
    • DApps
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Other Currencies
  • Reports
    • Private Sector Report
    • Rating Report
    • Novice Tutorial
    • Interviews
    • Exclusive View
  • All Posts
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
BlockMediaBlockMedia
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Market Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investment
  • Blockchain
    • Financial Market
    • Bank
    • Wallet
    • Payment
    • DeFi
    • Blockchain Platform
    • Supply Chain
    • DApps
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Other Currencies
  • Reports
    • Private Sector Report
    • Rating Report
    • Novice Tutorial
    • Interviews
    • Exclusive View
  • All Posts
BlockMediaBlockMedia
Home » ACE Files Lawsuit Claiming “KGI Bank’s Fund Transactions Halted, Impeding Salary Disbursement to Employees”; CEO’s Appointment as Interim Administrator Denied
Cryptocurrency

ACE Files Lawsuit Claiming “KGI Bank’s Fund Transactions Halted, Impeding Salary Disbursement to Employees”; CEO’s Appointment as Interim Administrator Denied

By adminMar. 27, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
ACE Files Lawsuit Claiming "KGI Bank's Fund Transactions Halted, Impeding Salary Disbursement to Employees"; CEO's Appointment as Interim Administrator Denied
ACE Files Lawsuit Claiming "KGI Bank's Fund Transactions Halted, Impeding Salary Disbursement to Employees"; CEO's Appointment as Interim Administrator Denied
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

ACE, one of the three major cryptocurrency exchanges in Taiwan, has been facing difficulties in its operations due to the involvement of its CEO, Wang Chenhuan, in a scam related to garbage currencies, leading to his detention. In order to resolve the issues with business operations and salary payments, the CEO, Wang Haoxu, recently applied to the court for the appointment of a temporary administrator. However, the court rejected the application as the problems raised did not meet the legal criteria for board dysfunction, and the issue of salary payments could be handled by the company itself.

Earlier this year in January, ACE, a Taiwanese cryptocurrency exchange, was hit by a scandal involving garbage currency fraud. Currently, a total of 11 individuals, including the co-founder and former chairman of ACE, Pan Yizhang, and the current CEO, Wang Chenhuan, have been detained and are prohibited from meeting anyone.

According to recent reports in the cryptocurrency community, the court has rejected the application made by ACE’s CEO, Wang Haoxu, to appoint a temporary administrator for ACE. This news has sparked rumors within the cryptocurrency community that ACE is facing significant challenges in its operations.

According to the court’s judgment, Wang Chenhuan, the company’s CEO, is the sole director and holds all the shares. His detention has resulted in the inability of the company to operate normally. The reasons cited by CEO Wang Haoxu in his application for the appointment of a temporary administrator include the company’s inability to make decisions, difficulties in obtaining external signatures, business disruptions, inability to transfer funds in and out of banks, and inability to pay employee salaries, system costs, and operating expenses.

This application was eventually rejected by the Taipei District Court. The court stated that the appointment of a temporary administrator is based on the condition of “board dysfunction” causing damage to the company’s operations and affecting shareholders’ rights. There must be specific matters that are urgent and require the personal handling of the directors in order to justify the appointment of a temporary administrator.

The reasons for the court’s rejection involve several points. Firstly, the financial problems raised by Wang Haoxu did not meet the threshold requiring board approval (above NT$300,000), and there were no concerns about the company’s daily operations. Secondly, Wang Haoxu, as the CEO, claimed to have been handling the monthly salaries and bonuses of over NT$2 million and had been signing off on them.

Lastly, the court explained that Wang Haoxu’s reasons for the salary issues were that the employee salaries were derived from transaction fees, but due to the involvement of the company’s CEO, Wang Chenhuan, in a criminal case, the cooperating bank (Cathay United Bank) expressed concerns about the source of the transaction fees, which restricted fund transfers and led to the delay in salary payments. This situation indicates that if there are salary payment issues at ACE, they are primarily caused by the bank’s concerns about the source of transaction fees and not due to board dysfunction. There is no direct correlation between the board’s ability to exercise its powers and the salary payment issue.

In summary, although the company’s CEO, Wang Chenhuan, has been detained, Wang Haoxu failed to prove that ACE’s physical operations were unable to continue or affected. Therefore, the court deemed it unnecessary to appoint a temporary administrator, as it does not align with the intention of the Company Law.

Furthermore, the court’s judgment explicitly states that it is aware that Cathay United Bank has frozen ACE’s funds, which are the transaction fee revenues. The users’ entrusted funds should be held separately and should be safe. However, if users are concerned about the safety of their assets, they can consider transferring or withdrawing their funds to reduce risks.

Due to conflicting statements from different parts of the cryptocurrency community, Dapp.com approached ACE to inquire about the situation mentioned in the initial application, such as the inability to make decisions, difficulties in obtaining external signatures, business disruptions, inability to transfer funds in and out of banks, and inability to pay employee salaries, system costs, and operating expenses. ACE responded that the company’s internal finances and operations are normal, and the application was made solely to exercise rights and protect the interests of users and employees, unrelated to the company’s financial condition.

[Image]

Related Reports:
– [Breaking News] ACE Exchange Caught in Cryptocurrency Scam! Founders Profited from “Air Coins” for Years, Estimated Illegal Gains Over 1 Billion NTD (Magic Coin)
– ACE’s Detained CEO Wang Chenhuan Allegedly Assisted in Money Laundering with “Thai Treasury” and Large Amounts of Stolen Money Hidden in Yilan Buddhist Temple
– Detainees at Detention Center Enjoy Lavish Chinese New Year Feast! ACE Exchange’s Wang Chenhuan, Pan Yizhang, and Fraud Mastermind Lin Genghong’s Current Situation: Daily Outdoor Time and Video Games Available.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleAnalyzing Ankr’s New Strategy: Becoming Bitcoin’s LIDO and Venturing into DePIN and AI Tracks
Next Article KuCoin Faces Legal Action by US Department of Justice and CFTC: Allegations, Official and Community Response, Fund Squeeze, and Future Outlook

Related Posts

Earning $4 Million in Two Months: Unveiling James Wynn’s “Hedge Fund for Small Accounts” Without Any Liquidations

Jun. 16, 2025

Coinbase Launches Bitcoin Cashback Credit Card Offering Up to 4% and Perpetual Contracts Available for U.S. Retail Investors

Jun. 13, 2025

Escalation of the Middle East Crisis: U.S. Urgently Withdraws Diplomats and Military Families, Crude Oil Surges Over 4% Overnight, U.S. Stock Market Declines Across the Board

Jun. 12, 2025
Don't Miss

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

By adminJun. 18, 2025

Taiwan’s Two Major Financial Institutions Suspend Virtual Currency Platform Account TransfersRecentl…

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
Our Picks

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

Jun. 18, 2025

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
Latest Posts

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

Jun. 18, 2025

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
About Us
About Us

BlockMedia, your comprehensive source for breaking blockchain news, in-depth analysis, and valuable resources. Unravel the blockchain revolution as it happens, with us.

Categories
© 2025 blockogmedia .

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.