Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Market Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investment
  • Blockchain
    • Financial Market
    • Bank
    • Wallet
    • Payment
    • DeFi
    • Blockchain Platform
    • Supply Chain
    • DApps
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Other Currencies
  • Reports
    • Private Sector Report
    • Rating Report
    • Novice Tutorial
    • Interviews
    • Exclusive View
  • All Posts
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
BlockMediaBlockMedia
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Market Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investment
  • Blockchain
    • Financial Market
    • Bank
    • Wallet
    • Payment
    • DeFi
    • Blockchain Platform
    • Supply Chain
    • DApps
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Other Currencies
  • Reports
    • Private Sector Report
    • Rating Report
    • Novice Tutorial
    • Interviews
    • Exclusive View
  • All Posts
BlockMediaBlockMedia
Home » Leader of ACE cryptocurrency scam Lin Genghong denies guilt We are a professional startup team not scammers
Cryptocurrency

Leader of ACE cryptocurrency scam Lin Genghong denies guilt We are a professional startup team not scammers

By adminJun. 7, 2024No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Leader of ACE cryptocurrency scam Lin Genghong denies guilt We are a professional startup team not scammers
Leader of ACE cryptocurrency scam Lin Genghong denies guilt We are a professional startup team not scammers
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

The ACE premier exchange fraud case was brought to court for the first time at the Taipei District Court yesterday. The alleged mastermind of the fraud ring, Lin Genghong, denied the accusations when he appeared in court yesterday morning, claiming that he never intended to break the law and conducted virtual currency transactions with the highest standards and strictest attitude, without any intention of fraud.

(Background:
Wei Desheng was accused of collaborating with Lin Genghong, the mastermind of the ACE fraud case, and urgently clarified: never met before
)
(Supplementary background:
ACE exchange Wang Chenhuan’s bail increased to 8 million! Electronic ankle monitor installed, complaining “all assets frozen” unable to flee
)
Table of Contents
Lin Genghong denies the accusations
Lawyers defend lack of criminal intent
Prosecutors accuse of concealing criminal proceeds
The ACE premier exchange collusion fraud case, announced by the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office on April 26,
investigation concluded, charging the head of the fraud ring Lin Genghong, former and current responsible individuals at ACE premier exchange, prominent lawyer Wang Chenhuan, and 32 others with offenses including organized crime, fraud, and money laundering, seeking over 20 years of imprisonment for the main suspects.

The prosecution indictment accuses the fraud ring of selling virtual currencies MOCT, CSO, FITC, NFTC since 2019, creating false investment white papers, selling them through Wangpai and ProEx exchanges, establishing IMBA direct sales teams for promotion, publishing fake news on online media, manipulating coin prices, deceiving 1292 victims into investing and purchasing, resulting in nearly 800 million yuan in fraud proceeds.

According to reports by Liberty Times, United Daily News, etc., the ACE exchange fraud case was brought to court for the first time on the 6th, with Lin Genghong and key members of the direct sales team Lin Ruoqiao summoned, while Pan Yizhang, Wang Chenhuan, and other exchange members will appear in court at a later date.

It is understood that Lin Genghong denied the accusations in court, emphasizing that virtual currency trading is a new industry with incomplete regulations, and he had no intention of committing fraud.

Lin Genghong argued that he knew virtual currencies could be traded but not used for fraud. Therefore, he turned to the Wangpai exchange, guided by KPMG, founded by Pan Yizhang, and the ABA accelerator established by Pan Yizhang received economic subsidies, making it credible and responsible for assisting the group in blockchain and virtual currency guidance.

Lin Genghong stated that all supervisors involved or employees writing white papers had professional knowledge, and he conducted virtual currency transactions with the highest standards and strictest attitude to innovate in virtual currency, without any intention of deceiving people.

Lin Genghong’s defense lawyer Xie Xiechang stated that the IMBA association was not established as a criminal organization for implementing fraud, there was no guarantee of profit in this case, all fund management had complete records and no intention of concealment or disguise.

Lin Genghong’s other appointed lawyer Chen Weicheng emphasized that if Lin Genghong truly wanted to commit fraud, he would not complicate matters in this way, and IMBA is not an organization with strict top-down control, with all chairmen and branch presidents just honorary titles, very different from the typical fraud group’s criminal model.

Lawyer Xue Qinfeng defended that the virtual currency created by Lin Genghong was not the worthless junk currency as alleged by the prosecution, and the prosecution must bear the burden of proof that virtual currency has no value. He also mentioned that salespeople had to pass an exam to join the IMBA sales team, indicating a certain level of difficulty, and if the company wanted to defraud or raise funds, it would not need to go to such lengths.

Previously, the prosecution accused Lin Genghong of moving the defrauded cash in batches to hide in the greater Taipei area, giving over 100 million yuan to the host Lin Shufen for the purchase and operation expenses of the Lianchi Temple, 43 million yuan to Wang Chenhuan, including 26 million yuan as capital increase for the Wangpai exchange, and another 17 million yuan to invest in a law firm in Bangkok, with 47.4 million yuan hidden by former “Innovative New Retail” general manager, assistant to the general manager of Sanli TV Company Li Yannan.

Wang Chenhuan was accused of acting as a “strategist” teaching Lin Genghong to modify white papers, arranging virtual currency exchange for physical goods services, listing them on DEEPCOIN, UNISWAP exchanges, assigning lawyers to obtain confidential information to the fraud ring, and providing his Zhongzheng Road house in Xindian for Lin Genghong, who was wanted, to hide in.

Related Reports
Former Deputy Director of Criminal Investigation Bureau suspected of becoming “fraud ring consultant” Zhuang Dingkai investigated
ACE cryptocurrency fraud case》Wang Chenhuan pleads guilty and posts 4 million bail; Pan Yizhang claims to be just a manager, Lin Genghong emphasizes contribution to the currency circle, both deny wrongdoing
ACE virtual currency fraud case: How can victims file lawsuits for compensation? When will downstream businesses be prosecuted? Progress of the trial..

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleBybits Bold Declaration Opening Account Registrations for Chinese Users Overseas Can They Avoid Regulatory Bans
Next Article Binance Resumes Credit Card Purchases for Cryptocurrency Regulatory Troubles Over

Related Posts

Earning $4 Million in Two Months: Unveiling James Wynn’s “Hedge Fund for Small Accounts” Without Any Liquidations

Jun. 16, 2025

Coinbase Launches Bitcoin Cashback Credit Card Offering Up to 4% and Perpetual Contracts Available for U.S. Retail Investors

Jun. 13, 2025

Escalation of the Middle East Crisis: U.S. Urgently Withdraws Diplomats and Military Families, Crude Oil Surges Over 4% Overnight, U.S. Stock Market Declines Across the Board

Jun. 12, 2025
Don't Miss

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

By adminJun. 18, 2025

Taiwan’s Two Major Financial Institutions Suspend Virtual Currency Platform Account TransfersRecentl…

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
Our Picks

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

Jun. 18, 2025

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
Latest Posts

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

Jun. 18, 2025

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
About Us
About Us

BlockMedia, your comprehensive source for breaking blockchain news, in-depth analysis, and valuable resources. Unravel the blockchain revolution as it happens, with us.

Categories
© 2025 blockogmedia .

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.