Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Market Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investment
  • Blockchain
    • Financial Market
    • Bank
    • Wallet
    • Payment
    • DeFi
    • Blockchain Platform
    • Supply Chain
    • DApps
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Other Currencies
  • Reports
    • Private Sector Report
    • Rating Report
    • Novice Tutorial
    • Interviews
    • Exclusive View
  • All Posts
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
BlockMediaBlockMedia
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Market Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investment
  • Blockchain
    • Financial Market
    • Bank
    • Wallet
    • Payment
    • DeFi
    • Blockchain Platform
    • Supply Chain
    • DApps
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Other Currencies
  • Reports
    • Private Sector Report
    • Rating Report
    • Novice Tutorial
    • Interviews
    • Exclusive View
  • All Posts
BlockMediaBlockMedia
Home » Goodbye Double Spending! Bitcoin’s 51% Attack and Ethereum’s 34% Attack Costs Exceed 1 Billion RMB; Coin Metrics: Hackers Find No Profit
Bitcoin

Goodbye Double Spending! Bitcoin’s 51% Attack and Ethereum’s 34% Attack Costs Exceed 1 Billion RMB; Coin Metrics: Hackers Find No Profit

By adminFeb. 17, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Goodbye Double Spending! Bitcoin's 51% Attack and Ethereum's 34% Attack Costs Exceed 1 Billion RMB; Coin Metrics: Hackers Find No Profit
Goodbye Double Spending! Bitcoin's 51% Attack and Ethereum's 34% Attack Costs Exceed 1 Billion RMB; Coin Metrics: Hackers Find No Profit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Cryptocurrency intelligence company Coin Metrics has conducted a study indicating that Bitcoin and Ethereum are essentially immune to potential 51% attacks and 34% attacks due to the enormous cost of attack and extremely low return on investment.

The cost of attacking Bitcoin and Ethereum?
Bitcoin’s 51% attack cost exceeds $20 billion
Ethereum’s 34% attack cost exceeds $34 billion

In a research report released by Coin Metrics on February 15, it was pointed out that due to the huge cost of attack, attackers would have little to no profit even if they succeeded. Currently, the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks are highly unlikely to suffer from 51% attacks and 34% attacks at the consensus mechanism level.

How much does it cost to attack Bitcoin and Ethereum?
In this report, a team of analysts led by Lucas Nuzzi, Head of Research at Coin Metrics, introduced a new indicator called “Total Cost of Attack (TCA)” to accurately quantify the cost associated with such attacks. The conclusion drawn was:

Bitcoin’s 51% attack cost exceeds $20 billion
We know that a 51% attack is a potential attack method against blockchain networks based on the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism. If a single entity or organization controls over 51% of the computing power, they can make changes to the entire network, such as modifying transaction order, preventing transaction verification, and launching double spend attacks, thus compromising the security of the network.

However, according to Coin Metrics’ report, based on the current market data and computing power, to launch a double spend attack on Bitcoin, one would need to purchase approximately 7 million mining machines, which would cost a staggering $20 billion. In reality, the current market does not have enough equipment to meet such demand. Additionally, even if certain entities (such as a national entity) could produce mining machines themselves, the production cost alone would exceed $20 billion.

Bitcoin’s 51% attack total cost

Ethereum’s 34% attack cost exceeds $34 billion
Similarly, a 34% attack is an attack method against blockchains such as Ethereum that are based on the Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism. Attackers only need to possess over 34% of the total staked tokens on the network to control its operation.

However, the Coin Metrics report states that launching a 34% attack on Ethereum is also impractical, as it would require enormous cost and consume significant time.

Ethereum’s 34% attack total cost

Finally, the Coin Metrics research team concludes:

Related reports:
Beginner’s Guide: Is your “Bitcoin” really completely yours in terms of asset security?
Breaking down the Layer 2 security risks of “Bitcoin/Ethereum” using the bucket theory
Call for reforming the fee system! Vitalik warns that high transaction fees will threaten the security of Ethereum.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleJoeman Confesses Bitcoin “Held but Never Sold”: A Believer in Cryptocurrencies
Next Article “US Banks Seek to Capitalize on Bitcoin Spot ETF: Urges SEC to Revise Cryptocurrency Asset Definition in Bid for Custody Service Market”

Related Posts

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025

Cardano Prepares for Coin-to-Coin Exchange: Founder Proposes $100 Million in ADA for Bitcoin and Stablecoins to Address DeFi Liquidity Issues

Jun. 14, 2025
Don't Miss

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

By adminJun. 18, 2025

Taiwan’s Two Major Financial Institutions Suspend Virtual Currency Platform Account TransfersRecentl…

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
Our Picks

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

Jun. 18, 2025

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
Latest Posts

Federal Bank Explains the Ban on Scheduled Transfers: High Proportion of Alert Accounts in Cryptocurrency Accounts Makes Fraudulent Money Flows Difficult to Track.

Jun. 18, 2025

Understanding Ethereum ERC-7786: A Unified Multichain Collaboration Standard, Heralding the Era of “Unity” in the ETH Ecosystem?

Jun. 18, 2025

ARK Invest Sells Approximately $51.7 Million of Circle Stock, Representing Only 10% of Cost Basis

Jun. 17, 2025

What Could Be the Potential Peak of Bitcoin This Cycle? An Analysis Using Multiple Valuation Models

Jun. 17, 2025
About Us
About Us

BlockMedia, your comprehensive source for breaking blockchain news, in-depth analysis, and valuable resources. Unravel the blockchain revolution as it happens, with us.

Categories
© 2025 blockogmedia .

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.